Lighter packaging: compare options that do the same job

The original diagram illustrates a packaging-reduction review. It does not show a measured weight saving or test result.

Start a lightweighting project with the finished package’s job. Define the product to protect, the transport conditions, presentation and opening. Compare complete options that meet the same use. The grammage difference between two sheets is not, by itself, evidence of a better package.

Identify each material’s role

Identify the role of each layer. PALETTE can be considered for a box wrap, and IMPRINT for a packaging-printing direction. Structural board and inserts perform their own tasks. An EARTH selection also needs a specific grade and application. A material-family name does not replace structural design or load assessment.

Confirm function, then record material use

Ask the converter to propose a change that can be prototyped, then use the actual materials. Review protection, opening, creases, bonds and condition after the intended transport. Once function is confirmed, record the composition and material use per finished item, including relevant cutting and production waste, on a consistent basis.

Plan paper use early

Fedrigoni Pulp recommends discussing quantity, format, page count, grammage and sheet use during planning. Apply this as a collaboration method: align design, purchasing and printing requirements early, rather than reducing the paper specification only after the artwork is complete.

Does lower grammage always mean a more sustainable choice? That single variable cannot decide it. Additional structure, damage or rework can change the comparison. Retain the functional approval and material-use records. Without the appropriate calculation, do not convert a weight reduction directly into a carbon-reduction percentage. Further reading: Fedrigoni Pulp’s sustainable printing guidance.